Training

Conventional Training Programs

Part 3

by Richard Gibbens

Our investigation has revealed that intensity and duration both heavily influence performance and that frequency of training plays a minor role in performance.  Furthermore, we have seen that when the intensity of training, the duration of training, or the volume of intense training is increased performance also increases.  Training programs of increasing weekly mileage that include increases in the duration, intensity, or volume of intense training will result in improved performance.  Training programs of higher weekly mileage that do not include increased duration, intensity, or volume of intense training will not produce significant improvements.

With these observations in mind, we now turn our attention to the examination of popular, conventional training programs that include significant increases in weekly mileage and are generally believed to improve performance.  Specifically we want to examine changes in the duration, intensity, and volume of intense training in these programs to see what changes, if any, in these variables are included in these programs.  We will examine three programs that are not only popular but are also typical of modern training methods and recommendations.

The Competitive Runner’s Handbook

In 1977 Bob Glover and Shelly-lynn Florence Glover first published The Competitive Runner’s Handbook and it has been continuously in print every since then.  The most recent edition, completely revised, was released in 1999.  The authors distinguish 4 categories of runners based on race performance – novice/ intermediate competitor, basic competitor, competitor/advanced competitor, and local champion.  Recommended training programs for various race distances are provided for each class of runner which include recommended weekly mileage, longest run distance, frequency of training, and speed workouts.  An outline of their general recommendations are detailed in table 10 (23).

Table 10:  Glover and Florence-Glover - Recommended weekly training mileage, long run, weekly frequency, and volume of intensity for different runner classifications

On the topic of weekly mileage, the Glovers’ suggest moderation.  They write,

“You need to put mileage in the bank – lots of it in progressive, moderate doses, accumulated day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.  Training mileage is the backbone of every runner’s program.  Too little and you fade before the finish line; too much and you don’t make it to the starting line healthy.  A balance is needed.” 

However, they also go on to write,

“Should you run as much per week as you can get away with, or run as little as you can get away with?  For most runners the commonsense answer is somewhere in between…Let the elites have their triple-digit mileage weeks.  The average runner needs much less to both improve and be healthy.”

A careful examination of the Glovers’ program reveals they recommend an increase in weekly mileage based on race performance, with the slowest performers running the least weekly mileage and the fastest runners running the highest weekly mileage (range 10 mpw – 80 mpw).  Each increase in weekly mileage is accompanied by an increase in the distance of the longest run.  As an example, for the ½ marathon the recommended long run for novice competitors is 13 miles while that for a local competitor it is 20 miles.  The volume of intense training also increases for each faster classification of runners.  For the ½ marathon novice runners peak at 4 weeks of 6 miles of intense running while local champions peak at 7 weeks of 8 miles and 1 week of 12 miles of intense running – a considerably higher volume of intense running for the fastest runners than that for the slowest runners.

Their recommended changes in training frequency are much smaller than changes in the length of the long run or the volume of intense training.  They begin with a training frequency of 4 - 5 days per week for the slower 5k runners increasing to a peak of just 6-7 days per week for the local champion training for the marathon.

In summary, following the guidance of the Glovers when your performance improves sufficiently to allow you to move up to the next higher classification you increase your weekly mileage, duration of long run, and volume of intensity. 

Set aside their classification of runners for a moment and consider the Glovers’ program with respect to our prediction that programs that increase duration, intensity, and volume of intense training will produce better performance.  Note that accompanying each increase in the performance classification is an increase in both the duration and volume of long runs and the volume of intense training, which we know will produce improved performance.  These increases would explain improvements that occur from following this program.

Road Racing for Serious Runners

Pete Pfitzinger, two time Olympian and exercise physiologist, and Scott Douglas, former editor-in-chief for Running Times magazine, teamed up and wrote the book Road Racing for Serious Runners, published in 1999.  In their book they proposed “multispeed training” for race distances from 5k to the Marathon.  Training recommendations are summarized in table 11 (24).

Table 11:  Pfitzinger & Douglas – recommended peak weekly mileage and long run for different runner classifications

Pfitzinger and Douglas classify training with respect to the competitive distance to be run (5k, 8-10k, 15k-1/2 marathon, and marathon) and the number of miles to be run each week.  They provide training programs that range from less than 20 miles per week to more than 60 miles per week, depending on the competitive distance and the goals of the athlete.  In their book Advanced Marathoning they state “There is some benefit, therefore, in doing relatively high mileage.” They also state “…racing performance improves with increased mileage…” (25). Even though they are discussing mileage in relation to marathon performance their views on the effectiveness of weekly mileage are clear.

An examination of their recommended training program reveals that, like the Glovers, Pfitzinger and Douglas recommend increases in the distance of the long run with each increase in weekly mileage.  They recommend a long run of 7 miles for the 20 miles per week 5k runner and increase steadily from there until reaching a peak of 22 miles per week for the marathon runner training more than 60 miles per week.  With one exception the shortest recommended long run distance is further than the distance to be raced – 7 miles for the 5k, 9 miles for the 10k, 17 miles for the ½ marathon, and 22 miles for the marathon (few marathon training programs recommend a long run longer than 22 miles).

Their recommended change in the volume of training intensity is not as pronounced as the Glovers.  They do recommend a general increase in the volume of intensity as the competitive distance and weekly training mileage increase, but the change is not as significant as that recommended by the Glovers.  For a 5k runner training at just 20 miles per week they recommend 4 weeks of twice weekly intense training session as compared to 11 weeks of twice weekly intense training for the 5k runner training more than 40 miles per week.  For the marathon they recommend either 15 or 16 total intense sessions irrespective of the weekly training mileage.

In terms of training frequency they do not prescribe a set number of workouts per week.  Instead they suggest scheduling the key recommended workouts for that week and then adding in additional weekly runs at an easy pace to reach the goal mileage for that particular week.

In summary, as would be expected the same trend of increasing the distance of the long run and the volume of intensity with increases in weekly mileage is evident in the training recommendations of Pfitzinger and Douglas.  These increases would explain improvements in performance that result from following this program.

Arthur Lydiard

Considered by some to be the most influential coach in the past 50 years, Arthur Lydiard’s running philosophy has spawned large numbers of devoted fans.  His training principles are believed to be employed by leading coaches and athletes the world over.  Arthur spent many years refining his training system, completing the major details in the 1950s.  Lydiard wrote several books over the years and while each contained subtle changes to his training systems, the basics of his system did not change.  More than any other element, his program is known for his prescription of running high weekly mileage, generally 100+ miles per week.  Arthur believed that the athlete first needed to develop a significant aerobic base by running a high weekly mileage, all at an easy pace. 

“The first step has to be to develop the cardio and blood vascular systems to high steady state…That means a big initial mileage.  You concentrate initially for several months on purely aerobic running.  Fast aerobic running is possible, keeping the effort just below that point where it can overbalance into anaerobic running.  You must do as much of this aerobic running as you can.  The minimum is three months.  Four months is better, five is better still but anything less than three months is not enough.” (26)

In order to build weekly mileage to a peak Lydiard recommends training daily and performing three long runs per week.  This is how Arthur described long runs for novice marathon training. 

“Allow three days a week for long runs – what you consider long depends on your level of fitness – but the aim eventually should be 90 minutes on two days and about two hours or more on one day.  That extra-long run could be increased every four or five weeks to take you near to the actual time you would take to run the marathon distance.” 

Table 12 sums Arthur’s recommended weekly training during the base building phase for distances from 5 km to the marathon (26).

Table 12:  Lydiard’s base building weekly training plan for various distances

Once the athlete has built an adequate base, Arthur then has the athlete transition to higher intensity running and a greater volume of intense training, accomplished by having the runner train in phases of different lengths and with specific training goals for each phase (26).  These phases are:

Transition period – 4 weeks

Anaerobic period – 4 weeks

Coordination work – 6 weeks

Racing period

The increase in volume of intense training during these phases is accomplished by substituting harder, more intense workouts for the easier, shorter training runs conducted in the base building phase.  The runner does not increase the frequency of training though.  During the higher intensity phases of training Lydiard has the runner continue to perform at least one weekly long run.  Table 13 illustrates his recommended training plan four weeks prior to various competitive distances (24).

Table 13:  Lydiard’s weekly training plan 4 weeks prior to competitive event